Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2019, 7:43 am
There are actually rules in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule that would lead you to that conclusion. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:59 am
But I am aware of only one case that suggests that TRIPS might be relevant for interpreting U.S. substantive law: in Rotec Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
As a general rule, a party does not have a right to appeal a court's interlocutory order or an interlocutory decision. *** See Matter of Carver v State of New York, 26 NY3d 272The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03870.htm [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:38 pm
In Jedwards International, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:32 pm
Our next case to discuss in The Gerson Company v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:53 am
United States, the Court of International Trade held that under the Harmonized System, pliers are versatile two-handled tools with jaws that pivot to squeeze an object. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:13 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:56 am
The Explanatory Notes the Harmonized System, which are not binding on U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
As a general rule, a party does not have a right to appeal a court's interlocutory order or an interlocutory decision. *** See Matter of Carver v State of New York, 26 NY3d 272The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03870.htm [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Eun Young Park, Appellate Review in Investor State Arbitration Gabriel Bottini, Reform of the Investor-State Arbitration Regime: The Appeal Proposal Jaemin Lee, Introduction of an Appellate Review Mechanism for International Investment Disputes: Expected Benefits and Remaining Tasks Kristina Anđelić, Why ICSID Doesn’t Need an Appellate Procedure, and What to Do Instead Roberto Castro de Figueiredo, Fragmentation and Harmonization in the ICSID Decision-Making Process Jan… [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:02 pm
R. 193, citing the Architectural Works Protection Copyright Act. [4] Id. [5] Id. [6] See generally Brandir International, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:23 pm
You can read all about that here, in the Brooklyn Journal of International Law.Along comes Chemtall, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:06 pm
Workplace Policies Both the program and policy should harmonize with the organization’s various workplace policies, including: Employee Personal Information and Privacy Electronic Use, Communications & Systems Social Media (which should include ownership of content provisions) Hours of Work and Overtime Harassment, Discrimination and Human Rights policies All of these issues are now set against the backdrop of an employee’s residual expectation of privacy, a… [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:23 am
The applicant relied on the AS v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (case C‑541/18, IPKat here). [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:04 am
The latter approach has its origin in a 1971 decision from the UK courts which referred to former English law (Amp Incorporated v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 12:48 pm
Saint Consulting Group, Inc., 772 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2014); Anani v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 12:48 pm
Saint Consulting Group, Inc., 772 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2014); Anani v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:33 am
Harmon Stores, Inc. [read post]
