Search for: "Harper v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 1,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Karen Tani
Cooper (GrayCrown), by journalist Geoffrey Gray (here); The Golden Empire: Spain, Charles V, and the Creation of America (Random House), by British historian Hugh Thomas (here); and the prison memoir Then They Came for Me: A Family’s Story of Love, Captivity, and Survival (Random House), by Iranian Canadian journalist/filmmaker Maziar Bahari with Aimee Molloy (here).For lighter fare, head to the New York Times, where you'll find a review of THE BIG SCRUM: How Teddy Roosevelt… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am by Kelly
(ArsTechnica) Google announces changes to better protect copyright on the Internet (ArsTechnica) (PlagiarismToday) (Public Knowledge) Anti-piracy campaign clothes, now for babies – IRIS campaign (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Capitol Records – Court files reveal EMI promoted music on ‘piracy haven’ RapidShare : Capitol Records v MP3Tunes (TorrentFreak) Crippen – Prosecutors dismiss Xbox-modding case mid-trial: USA v… [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:33 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
First, the appellate panel calls the fourth factor the most important consideration, and cites the case of Harper & Row v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Susan Brenner
 While in the United States, [Diamreyan] made no effort to obtain legitimate employment or to advance his education; instead, he continued his involvement in the scheme to defraud.Brief for the United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm by David Kopel
., and Harpers Ferry, Va., were ordered to invent the means of producing firearms with interchangeable parts. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Nixon was correct rather than deferring to the state court’s interpretation under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and whether the state court’s interpretation of Florida v. [read post]