Search for: "Howard v. People" Results 661 - 680 of 908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2024, 6:11 am by Ilya Somin
That broad consensus is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
opan style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> SCOTUS docket hereRicci v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:09 am by Stan
For people who thought that the A/V products case was about film quotas and profit sharing, I can certainly understand why they would disappointed by the eventual deal struck between the U.S. and China, which did involve adjustments in both of those areas. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm by admin
  The altruism some people would substitute for it may, when it has arrived, bring with it a higher sense of justice but it has not arrived. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
The bishops also apologised for the rejection, exclusion and hostility that LGBTQI+ people have faced in some of our churches. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:46 am by Nathan
(Decision and Order, Sept. 17, 2008 at 67.) -=-=-=-=- And it’s just a slap in the face for the Appellate Division to cite to People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:47 am by SHG
Howard Wasserman raises some questions about the efficacy of online teaching. [read post]