Search for: "Hughes v. United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 924
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Research & resources In an unpublished paper entitled “Quacks like a Duck: a New Test for News-Media Libel in the United States”, Carrie Leonetti of the University of Oregon School of Law argues that the actual-malice standard promotes sloppy reporting. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
”1 Aside from the granular problems stated above, and recognizing that the proposed amendments would in fact add to the problem astutely noted in the quote above by Lawrence Lessig, there is a global, more systemic conflict at issue within the realm of copyright enforcement litigation deserving mention. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
Filburn (1942) and United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:29 am
United States, involving similar issues. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm
The courts John Hugh Brady v the United Kingdom – 37536/08 [2012] ECHR 965 (22 May 2012). [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am
,” Chief Justice Hughes asked there. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Baker Hughes Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
KL Gates has a fine post in its Electronic Discovery Law Blog about a recent case, United Factory Furniture Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
” Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm
Accessing politicians’ tax returns In more access to information commentary, Hugh Tomlinson QC on Inforrm has noted the freedom of expression dimension to the debate concerning the disclosure of politicians’ tax returns. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:35 am
Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office “The adults in the room” (direct quote) know you have to pay for patents or you’re going to get sued. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
I missed the first one, United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
An “Officer of the United States” is, according to the Supreme Court, “any appointee exercising significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
His most recent book, The Supreme Court and the NCAA, examines the antitrust and due process consequences for college football and basketball of the United States Supreme Court's decisions in NCAA v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]