Search for: "In Interest of Ep"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am
Two communities involved in infertility/cancer research: oncologists, who are interested in understanding cell division; endocrinologists, who in part work on addressing infertility. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm
This is an interesting question, since you may not live to collect you Social Security in retirement. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 1:28 pm
EP is not interested in the event. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:59 am
Reasons for opting out of the UPC system were the risk of an invalidity decision concerning all national parts of a European Patent, familiarity of national court systems and lower costs, at least in Germany, for the enforcement of a national part of an EP. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:12 am
The case raises and answers an interesting question: under English law, does an assignment of a patent (other than by deed) require consideration? [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:48 am
Accord, a generics manufacturer, initiated proceedings, seeking revocation of medac’s patent (EP 2046332), which related to the use of methotrexate for subcutaneous administration in the treatment of inflammatory autoimmune diseases, wherein the methotrexate is administered in a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent at a concentration of about 50mg/ml. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
In the English proceedings, the computer model was held to be subject to the Notice of Experiments regime (see Connsafe v Emtunga [1999] RPC 154).Take home pointsThe case makes for an interesting read as to how the Patents Court will approach various case management issues. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am
HP's EP 1306918 was also mentioned. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
The product is protected by Lilly’s patent, EP (UK) 0 721 777 (“the Patent”) and a SPC. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:26 am
Of interest, the claimant also argued a second basis - that section 100 of the Patents Act 1977 applied. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:59 am
While the Examining Division and the Board had to look at whether due care was taken by each party involved, the interesting part of each decision concerns the actions of the EP attorneys.The orthodox view of the EP attorney's responsibilities can be seen from the first instance decision of the Examining Division which held:"according to the above-mentioned jurisprudence [i.e. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
The 15-judge federal court of appeals for the Sixth Circuit has just handed down an interesting and important First Amendment decision. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
Sometimes post-marital agreements can be a good fall back, if both parties realize the need for some clarity of rights and interests once hitched. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 11:10 am
Is it cyber-enabled collection of information that could be used against a nation’s security interests? [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 8:31 am
Still, the decision is interesting beyond Germany.The claimant, Austrian Schnabl Stecktechnik GmbH, was the owner of a patent for a method of fastening electrical installations (tubes) to a wall (the decision does not state the patent number, but I believe it to be EP 0 105 865 B1). [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm
Social housing is a scarce resource, and the Government believes that it is appropriate, proportionate and in the public interest to restrict access in this way, to ensure that, as far as possible, sufficient affordable housing is available for those amongst the local population who are on low incomes or otherwise disadvantaged and who would find it particularly difficult to find a home on the open market. 13. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:50 am
Readers interested in that case may wish to know that the decision was upheld on appeal (see here), and that there was a further decision, principally about costs (see here).Returning to the silverised wound dressings case, infringement turned on the question of what is meant by "1" in the context of a claimed range of 1 to 25%. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:26 am
On appeal, the BGH reverses.While the findings on inventive step are very much tied to the specific prior art and shall not be addressed further, the Bundesgerichtshof makes some interesting remarks regarding the exclusion of "presentations of information as such" from patentable subject matter. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 6:59 am
FINRA found that at least seven firm customers purchased interests in the offering from an issuer-rep and lost their collective investment principal of approximately $560,000. [read post]
