Search for: "In Re: Andrews v."
Results 661 - 680
of 1,707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 5:16 am
First Amendment Constraints on Copyright After Golan v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:05 pm
LEXIS 1122 (La. 5/10/2011) Remand ordered to conduct an evidentiary hearing on failure to investigate and present mitigation evidence Ex parte Andrew Anthony Apicella; (In re: Andrew Anthony Apicella v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 6:56 pm
District Judge Andrew J. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Sir Andrew Nicol found that the proceedings amounted to an abuse of process and should be struck out accordingly. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
ProPublica – Andrew Suozzo | Published: 8/2/2022 Forty members of Congress asked the IRS and the Treasury Department to investigate what the lawmakers termed an “alarming pattern” of right-wing advocacy groups registering with the tax agency as churches, a move that allows the organizations to shield themselves from some financial reporting requirements and makes it easier to avoid audits. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
This is spring break for many American schoolchildren, meaning that they’re spending the week in exotic destinations, trying local specialties, and enjoying beautiful scenery with their loving parents. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:28 am
” Andrew J. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re writes that in Kansas v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Lewis v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:50 am
” Woodward v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:39 am
Fairstein, Andrew T. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
In Fields v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
A tale of Dudes and Smoothies Katfriend Richard Kempner discusses Fresh Trading Limited v Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited and Andrew Thomas Robert Chappell [2015] EWHC 52 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision addressing the copyright ownership in the ‘Dude’, ie the logo used on Innocent’s smoothie bottle in the past 15 years. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Board, and they think they’re not eligible. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
In Plumhoff v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 12:14 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:17 am
In Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
In its June 2014 decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
