Search for: "In Re First Federal Corp."
Results 661 - 680
of 3,593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
Pennsylvania Eng’g Corp., 102 F.3d 194, 198 (5th Cir. 1996)… . [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
In the first case, House Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:54 am
”); In re E. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am
And if we’re concerned about large entities censoring opinions with which they disagree, I nominate our own federal government as a way bigger threat. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers under the Trump Administration proposed a new definition of the “Waters of the United States. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:34 am
Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
” For example, in the notorious Milward case, the First Circuit, citing legally invalid pre-Daubert decisions, stated that “when the factual underpinning of an expert’s opinion is weak it is a matter affecting the weight and credibility of the testimony − a question to be resolved by the jury. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am
” The late Judge Sam Pointer, appointed to preside over MDL 926, In re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability Litigation, Master File No. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm
As the U.S. prepares to re-open after an unprecedented moment of pause during the COVID-19 pandemic, many people across the country have used this time for personal reflection. [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:55 pm
First, Stonewall contends Oliver Block’s federal court affidavit fits the bill. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
Co., 560 U.S. 242, 252-53 (2010); In re Nat’l Lloyds Ins. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
6 May 2020, 7:58 am
Cir. 2020) In this case, the Federal Circuit held that an IPR petitioner did not have a right to raise the Arthrex appointments issue on appeal unless the issue was first raised before the PTAB. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8019, the Court has examined the briefs and record and determined that oral argument is unnecessary because “the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
(…) see also In re Cordis Corp., 769 F.2d 733, 735, 737 (Fed. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm
” Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
It could re-open any time after the health department order expires on April 24. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
While the Commission reiterated that past auction results will not be re-opened (see, e.g., PJM MOPR Order I, 170 FERC ¶ 61,034 at P 89), no Commission can bind its future members, and case law indicates that the Commission retains the authority to rectify its legal error retroactively. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 12:40 pm
In a far-reaching decision with sweeping implications, a federal district judge in Montana eliminated the Army Corps’ nationwide permit for utility line crossings over waters of the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:07 pm
Allco approached Green Mountain Power Corp. [read post]
