Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel"
Results 661 - 680
of 900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.Appeals -- Law of the case -- Petition for review of order sealing judicial record, filed by intervenor, who sought tape recordings and transcripts of recordings which state and defendant claimed were recordings of defense attorney and a forensic psychologist working with defense counsel that were made without consent of either -- Petition for review denied -- Intervenor must accept record and pleadings as they exist and may not raise new issues -- Per… [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
The court has denied review on at least two past petitions raising the same issue. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:33 pm
We have reached that conclusion based on medical records, contemporaneous video and documentary evidence, and interviews with victims and survivors. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 11:07 am
When the panel is reviewing a jury verdict, for example, your argument may sound similar to a dense, evidence-focused, closing statement. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:47 pm
A stool specimen collected on March 14 at Legacy Emmanuel Medical Center tested culture positive at Oregon State Public Health Laboratory for shiga toxin-producing E. coli O157 (Case ID#556818). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
On this record, the district court properly concluded these claims are preempted.Bryant, 623 F.3d at 1206-07 (various citations omitted).One judge on the Bryant panel disse [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:01 am
Cases involving Class III medical devices and fraud on the FDA claims were also inapposite; there was no “comparably rigorous review” or premarket approval for foods here, and the extensive regulation of Class III medical devices gave preemption a different context than the FDA’s “substantial, but more limited oversight of food labeling requirements” that explicitly recognized a state role. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Indeed, the Board of Trustees of the American Medical Association has recommended that the presentation of expert testimony should be considered part of the practice of medicine and thus subject to peer review[8]. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 1:14 pm
Plaintiffs: We're not telling. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:00 am
Glenn Gerstell, CSIS senior advisor and former General Counsel for the National Security Agency, will moderate the panel featuring policymakers and practitioners. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
At the same time, the re creation of the dynamics of either, especially for the best of intentions produces the impulse toward the sort of national infantilization that might have been understood as a cornerstone for the justification of 20th century empire. [read post]
31 May 2013, 1:47 pm
We’re excited to have her on board. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:22 pm
It's got a bunch of glass panels and low-hanging certificates, with matte paint that doesn't wash off very well. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:29 pm
If we’re lucky enough to hire you, you’ll be a part of the Center’s four-person leadership team, where you’ll help shape the Center’s overall programming and strategy. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:21 am
See In re Silica Prods. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:33 pm
Martin O'Malley are examined by a legislative panel. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:09 pm
” She did not wait for the night to end before making the decision to seek medical attention. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, et al., 796 F.3d 18 (D.C. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. [read post]
