Search for: "J A" Results 661 - 680 of 124,224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2024, 9:06 pm by Michael Douglas
A very practical difficulty arose here, reflected in Steward J noting (in dissent) that the High Court was ‘faced with an invidious choice’: see [228]. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
(Megan Gramham, Wall Street Journal) Challenging Corporate Influence in the Nonprofit Sector (Anne Price, Nonprofit Quarterly) These AI-Powered Nonprofits Are Making Health Care More Equitable and Effective (Kevin Barenblat & Nick Cain, Stanford Social Innovation Review) In Counterculture San Francisco, a Church Has Become the Place to Be (Heather Knight, NY Times) ‘We Can Save Our City’: The $100 Million Plan to Revive East Oakland (Sara Herschander, Chronicle of… [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on Emily Zackin and Chloe Thurston, The Political Development of American Debt Relief (University of Chicago Press, 2024).Devin Caughey The Political Development of American Debt Relief (PDADR) is a concise yet panoramic account of the political economy of debt relief over the course of American history. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction Law students are likely to encounter the concept of discretion early in the first year of law school. [read post]
17 Aug 2024, 2:53 pm by Ezra Rosser
Fields Taxing Undocumented Immigrants Redux by Francine J. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm by Legal Insurrection Staff
As crime spikes and morale dips, Milwaukee's finest throw their weight behind Trump and Vance The post Milwaukee Police Association Endorses President Trump and J.D. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 9:08 am by Richard Pildes
From the NYT: Brad Raffensperger, Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, has been forced to spend half a million dollars defending himself in court for having stood up to former President Donald J. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 8:52 am by Howard Knopf
Barnes J in the Department of Finance case said that “(t)he suggestion that Blacklock’s business model cannot survive in the face of the minor and discrete use that took place here is essentially an admission that the market places little value on Blacklock’s work-product … It also goes without saying that whatever business model Blacklock’s employs it is always subject to the fair dealing rights of third parties” (para 45). [read post]