Search for: "JUDICIAL BRANCH "
Results 661 - 680
of 8,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2025, 5:21 am
But I don't think it was proper to frame it the way it was framed, with virtually no acknowledgment that, "[n]ever mind the name," precedents make clear that the Library of Congress indeed "doesn't actually belong to Congress" but is rather—for constitutional purposes—an Executive Branch agency.The post Washington Post Article Stresses the Library of Congress's Name, but Largely Ignores Judicial Precedent … appeared first on… [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:29 pm
But if the judiciary is just another political branch, then there is no reason to consider its resolution of disputes to be authoritative--to be binding on citizens and the other branches of government. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:30 am
Article III creates a hierarchical judicial branch: it place one Supreme Court at the top of the judicial heap and designates all other courts and tribunals “inferior” to that Court. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 6:32 am
You are a judge in the judicial branch of government. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 2:35 pm
The post Chief Justice Roberts bats for judicial independence in annual year-end report appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 5:07 am
What we have instead are nine perfect judicial thoroughbreds who have spent their entire adulthoods on the same lofty, narrow trajectory. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:00 pm
This puts the administrative and judicial on seemingly opposite ends of the subject matter issue, even more so under the new PTO subject matter guidelines. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 7:00 am
Indeed, the ISLT, properly understood, inverts a core principle of judicial federalism and maintains that the federal constitution empowers federal courts to override the judgments of state courts, state executive-branch officials, and state voters about the meaning of state law. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:47 am
Speaking of Justice Miller, he's quoted in an article in today's DJ (Judicial Branch Works to Reduce Committees). [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 12:25 pm
As Lloyd McAulay, long active in the cause of judicial selection, put it: "Those who seek to have the selection of judges taken out of the fingers of the electorate [and place the appointive power in the executive branch of government will find that] concentrated power is more dysfunctional than democratic miasma. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:30 am
Kim Brooks In modern regulatory states, the theoretically firm lines dividing the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government are increasingly blurred. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 6:41 am
Since it was formed as a judicial branch committee in 1978, Judicial Conduct has recommended discipline only 17 times, and never for a member of the SJC. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:09 am
By Gregory Curfman Throughout its October 2021-2022 term, the Supreme Court has shown no evidence of judicial restraint, dispelling any remaining illusions that the judiciary is, in the words of Alexander Bickel and Alexander Hamilton, “The Least Dangerous Branch. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 8:16 am
I'm an old used judicial clerk, first for U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Background on Congressionally Mandated Reports Congress receives thousands of reports each year from executive and judicial branch officials and agencies. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 10:43 am
Only 10 percent of voters backed the measure that would have stripped judicial immunity and established an unaccountable fourth branch of government to intimidate judges. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 12:28 pm
Or by the political branches? [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 8:44 pm
The process of judicial appointments is probably one of the most important ways that the political branch of government affects the judicial branch. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:23 am
The judicial branch is one of three branches of government, and although it has considerable powers, it has inherent limitations, too. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:17 am
The main obstacle to judicial review of an unexecuted, potentially lethal targeting order is not that the president or elected branches have unreviewable discretion to identify and engage threats to the United States. [read post]
