Search for: "Kind v. Superior Court" Results 661 - 680 of 1,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am by Schachtman
  A jury heard the case in January and February 2011, in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:26 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Superior Court of New Jersey – Appellate Division: State v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 9:39 pm by Thomas Kaufman
Superior Court (Brinker), and the case was remanded to the court of appeal to consider in light of the Brinker decision. [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:23 am
" In the recent state Supreme Court race, Superior Court Judges Debra Todd and Maureen Lally-Green cited the rule in declining to state their views on such issues as abortion or gun control. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm by cdw
Superior Court (Pearson) holds that, despite Proposition 115,  section 1054.9 is valid because that proposition governs only pretrial discovery and does not prohibit postconviction discovery of the kind envisioned by section 1054.9 . [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 5:15 am by Susan Brenner
  He moved to dismiss the charges for lack of venue and the Superior Court of Clayton County granted the motion. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:35 pm
Or Nina Baccala of North Providence, cum laude from the New England School of Law and clerk for Superior Court Judge Raymond J. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am by Eric Goldman
The persons and entities within the “zone of risk” for economic harm that the School Districts would have this court recognize include youth organizations and their leaders; educational institutions of all kinds (not just public elementary and secondary schools); medical providers and medical facilities that may be required to provide care for mentally ill minors affected by social media without full compensation for the medical services; employers; and siblings or… [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Wrote a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department court in reinstating Chontay Kirby’s first and only cause of action for discrimination in her 11-page complaint, “Although plaintiff’s first cause of action is labeled as one for ‘hostile workplace,’” the lower court “was not bound by that designation and plaintiff has sufficiently stated a cause of action for employment discrimination under both the New York State… [read post]