Search for: "Lowers v. Lowers (Complete Opinion)"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,752
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
Louisiana) There is, of course, one prominent example where the Supreme Court completely hijacked a case and decided it on alternate grounds: Mapp v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a brief opinion concurring in the dismissal to note that he shared the concerns of dissenting justices that the lower courts were misapplying the court’s Second Amendment precedents. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:40 am
The opinion says Primeau and Iwanow were childhood friends, but lost touch. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
The Court was sharply divided in Republican National Committee v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm
You just completely misunderstood all of those old cases. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:37 am
and the various opinions of the Justices. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm
The Act, among other things, established the makeup of the Supreme Court and its exclusive jurisdiction and also the lower court structure. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 11:59 am
The Trump administration recently relied on this latter remedy to suspend aspects of the INF Treaty in response to alleged Russian material breaches, even before the United States completed its eventual withdrawal in August 2019. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
” (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm
Professor Rick Hasen has some thoughts on RNC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:10 am
In its opinion last month, the appellate court held that the assignment was void ab initio because it was executed only by the two members of Faction #1 holding an aggregate 50% interest, i.e., without authorization by a majority in interest of the members as required by the LLC’s operating agreement. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am
The Court stated it “finds that the delivery of Grams to the Initial Purchasers, who would resell them into the public market, represents a near certain risk of a future harm, namely the completion of a public distribution of a security without a registration statement. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Newsom aims to have environmental review completed by early 2022. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 2:46 pm
Boal v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 10:19 am
Another trial was taking place in the court of public opinion. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
The unsigned majority opinion invoked the principle—previously articulated in a number of cases but most closely associated with Purcell v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
This case will be one to watch as it moves forward in the lower Pennsylvania courts. [read post]
