Search for: "MARTINEZ V. STATE"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2024, 5:35 am
How does the Fourth Department's line of cases square with the New York Court of Appeals' decision Martinez v City of New York? [read post]
17 May 2007, 12:55 pm
" Martinez, 528 U.S. at 164. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:11 am
Martinez v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 9:42 am
(c) United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
A recent decision, Martinez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:26 am
The high court's decision to let this execution proceed bodes well for the State of Arizona's position in the pending case on ineffective assistance of counsel on state collateral review, Martinez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court subsequently decided two cases, Martinez v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:20 am
”Martinez v Monroe County Community College, 2008 NY Slip Op 0090, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Decided on February 1, 2008, is another decision that addresses same-sex marriage.The New York State Department of Civil Service recognizes same-sex marriage that is legal in the jurisdiction where it was performed for the purposes of eligibility for spousal benefits for NYSHIP health insurance State employees and the employees of participating… [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 5:37 pm
As we recently adopted in Martinez v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Martinez; Wisconsin v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:33 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 4:01 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm
Most compelling in a review of the Mendoza-Martinez factors is that the State has a very important non-punitive purpose in enacting this designation provision and it has tailored a limited provision to deal with this purpose. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 9:44 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:10 pm
In the case of State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:45 am
When determining a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), "the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action," and "the court must accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory'" (Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180, 1180-1181, quoting Leon v Martinez,… [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:50 pm
Martinez, which was also argued today. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
Martinez, and New Process Steel v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
Neither [United States v.] [read post]
