Search for: "MATTER OF H D" Results 661 - 680 of 3,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2007, 8:07 pm
I'd bet that a combination of Ed Kosiur's stunning SORR-related political defeat and the looming reality of incurring large legal expenses in a losing cause made Ms. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am by Aaron L. Nielson
” Indeed, it was said that the week of Christmas is one in which “secular matters receive less attention than at any other time of year. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘Ahn’s actions violate his obligations under Texas and national ethical standards that prohibit attorneys from participating in matters that are both adverse to a previous client and substantially related to matters in which they previously represented that client — standards that apply to Ahn’s conduct in this case regardless of whether he chooses to enter a formal appearance,” Samsung argued. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 2:13 am by Stephen Pitel
Territorial competence in respect of necessary parties (s. 3(d.1)); 5. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:05 am by Rose Hughes
By contrast, T 1989/18 was only given a "D" distribution and did not appear as a Selected Decision. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
Matter of M-H-Z-, 26 I&N Dec. 757 (BIA 2016): The Board held that the national security bar found in INA § 212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI) which applies to people who have provided material support to a terrorist organization, contains no implied duress exception. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
Matter of M-H-Z-, 26 I&N Dec. 757 (BIA 2016): The Board held that the national security bar found in INA § 212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI) which applies to people who have provided material support to a terrorist organization, contains no implied duress exception. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:02 am by Derek T. Muller
(Then, subsection (d) required one to be a bone fide resident of the state for three months before the bar exam, and subsection (h) required someone to “have passed a final bar examination given by the examining committee. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 2:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Kings Grand Larceny Lawyer said that, The defendant has made a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10(1)(b), (f) and (h) for an order vacating the judgment of conviction on the grounds that the judgment was obtained in violation of his "constitutional rights, ineffective counsel, and the judgment was procured by trickery, deceit and prejudical conduct on the part of my assigned attorney." [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 50/1(D)(h) A parent can sign away their rights to a child via an adoption in Illinois. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
He might not actually be thinking, “Oh, I’d better lie because telling the truth would threaten my support. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
This, however, is false—not as a matter of opinion or political belief, but as a matter of arithmetic and accounting.Even so, people have come to believe that Social Security will completely disappear, because Republicans and journalists tell them so. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:26 am
Nonetheless, the discussion itself may well have substantial implications for the tenor and trajectories of discussions about complicity as a matter of civil liability and as a factor in the way that complicity is understood both as a moral matter and as part of corporate responsibility to respect human rights under the 2nd Pillar of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights and related normative standards. [read post]