Search for: "MATTER OF J L S A D S" Results 661 - 680 of 1,976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
J & N Records, LLC, 504 F.3d 151, 164–65 (1st Cir. 2007) (dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was not on the merits and Defendant was not entitled to recover as prevailing party under Section 505) (citing Buckhannon Bd. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
{And, though it does not matter to the constitutional issue, the appellate court's conclusion that the order was a TRO and not a preliminary injunction is likely incorrect. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Sup. 2006) (quoting Sosna), aff’d, 841 N.Y.S.2d 469 (N.Y.A.D. 2007); Power v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm by admin
Cheng tells us, unhelpfully, that “[d]etermining consensus is difficult in some cases, and less so in others. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Rockwell Internat’l Corp., 580 F. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
The parties agreed to not use the term “oligarch” in the proceedings.[29] From the 38 works Rybolovlev bought through Bouvier, 12 were arranged with assistance from Sotheby’s to Bouvier, and only four of those were at issue in trial.[30] These four include Leonardo da Vinci’s Salvador Mundi, Modigliani’s Tete, Klimt’s Wasserschlangen II, and Magritte’s Domaine d’Arnheim. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am by Eugene Volokh
(Hull, J., joining Judge Wellford’s opinion on this question). [read post]