Search for: "Mark Miller" Results 661 - 680 of 2,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2018, 4:04 pm by Jeff Richardson
Mark Gurman and Nico Grant of Bloomberg report that Adobe will release Photoshop for iPad in 2019. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 7:15 am by Aaron S. Marines
  That is because 2017 marked the countywide reassessment for all properties. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
 In an op-ed at TC Palm, Mark Miller considers how the topic of stare decisis, or adherence to precedent, may come up during the confirmation, noting that “while stare decisis is a vital legal principle, the justices of the Supreme Court have never considered it a non-negotiable command. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 3:38 pm by NCC Staff
Miller of Duke Law School, and Kurt Lash of the Richmond School of Law. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from Mark Miller in an op-ed for The Hill, Jessica Prol Smith at The Federalist, Kevin Theriot at The Federalist, Elissa Graves in an op-ed for Fox News, and Michael Farris in an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:58 am
"Unfortunately," Pocan continued, "President Trump and his team of white nationalists, including Stephen Miller, have so misused ICE that the agency can no longer accomplish its goals effectively. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Carpenter also leaves some obvious question marks: What about short-term historical CSLI? [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
Smith and Miller are only two examples; there are many others. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm by Victoria Clark
This visit marks is the first time the Chinese government has announced Kim’s presence while he is still in the country. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 12:16 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller takes a similar view, maintaining that “this case is less about Gundy than it is about the Supreme Court reining in the regulatory state run amok, and requiring Congress to get back to doing its job. [read post]