Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2010, 7:51 am
Lemley, Mark A. (2000), “Reconceiving Patents in the Age of Venture Capital,” Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law, 4, 137-148. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 9:21 am
Mark Lemley (Stanford) is McFarling’s attorney. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:57 pm
Lemley (Stanford)[151 downloads] Peripheral Disclosure by Jason Rantanen (U. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
Mark Lemley cited Cecil Quillen early on in the Northwestern Law Review article on rational ignorance. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
Mark Lemley (Stanford)Thomas Field (New Hampshire)Ted Sichelman (UCSD)Peter Menell (Berkeley)Robert Merges (Berkeley)Lee Petherbridge (Loyola)Gregory Mandel (Temple)Dennis Crouch (Missouri)Scott Hemphill (Columbia)Dan Burk (Irvine)Rochelle Dreyfuss (NYU)Jason Rantanen (Iowa)Jay Kesan (Illinois)Shamnad Basheer (West Bengal National University)James Bessen (Research on Innovation)Gideon Parchomovsky (Penn)Ralph Clifford (U Mass Dartmouth)Jonathan Masur (Chicago)Ronald Mann… [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 10:24 am
So far we've published articles by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging scholars. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:15 am
The speaker will be Stanford's Mark Lemley presenting his paper, "Irrelevant Confusion. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:16 am
Mark Lemley and Mark McKenna’s article, “Irrelevant Confusion,” which I think is destined to become a watershed in trademark scholarship. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:05 am
Dan Burk, Mark Lemley, Inherency, 47 William & Mary Law Review 371 (2005). [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 7:06 pm
I'll offer a preliminary answer of my own:I start with the observation (credited to Mark Lemley) noted at TAN 176: "The lack of protection in some of these areas may be explicable as resulting from their nature as necessities: we all need clothes, haircuts, furniture, and good, and indeed the useful articles doctrine is aimed at ensuring that useful things are excised from copyright's domain. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
Lemley: A.f. as a doctrinal/channeling device that maps to regular functionality: design patent and utility patent. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Citing both Dogan/Lemley and Dinwoodie/Janis is a good example: those articles don’t say the same thing. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
It viewed the former as being a mere product of nature and unpatentable, while the latter was deemed not naturally occurring and therefore patentable.Patentable Subject MatterThe first speaker of the day, Mark Janis, law professor at the University of Indiana, Bloomington, took a step back from the traditional view of eligibility. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
Footnote 131: Mark A. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In their article The Antibody Patent Paradox (2023), Mark Lemley and Jake Sherkow argue that the “full scope” requirement is poorly reflective of antibody science and threatens innovation. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
Lemley: What things go into cost and benefit buckets? [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 9:56 am
**Mark Lemley is also mentioned. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:28 pm
JAFFE & JOSH LERNER, INNOVATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS: HOW OUR BROKEN PATENT SYSTEM IS ENDANGERING INNOVATION AND PROGRESS, AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT 32-34 (2004); Mark Lemley et al., What to Do About Bad Patents, REGULATION, Winter 2005-2006, at 10, available at http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/lichtman/bad-patents.pdf. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 10:51 am
The back cover of the book contains the enthusiastic endorsement of Professor Mark Lemley of Stanford University. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:40 pm
The women have settled with three other anonymous defendants, says Mark Lemley, a professor at Stanford Law School who is also of counsel at Keker & Van Nest in the Bay Area. [read post]
