Search for: "Mark Lemley"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 12:43 am
Mark Lemley: McKenna's argument is an incompleteness theorem: we can't completely describe a formal system within that system. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:56 pm
For example, Professor Mark Lemley has published several articles that are highly theoretical, but address issues of critical interest to litigants. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:21 pm
In the recent era only six law professors (Mark Lemley, Cass Sunstein, Akhil Reed Amar, William Eskridge, Robert Post, and Reva Siegel) have had more citations and only seven other law professors (Stephen Bainbridge, Lucian Arye Bebchuk, Yochai Benkler, John Coffee, Dan Kahan, Lawrence Lessig, and Benjamin Spencer) have had as many top citations as the three IL citation superstars. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 10:24 am
So far we've published articles by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging scholars. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:05 am
We have a set of great speakers coming that include Mark Lemley (Stanford) and Peter Menell (Berkeley). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:03 am
Brett followed up with pieces co-authored with leading communications scholar Barbara van Schewick and leading patent guru Mark Lemley. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm
Becton Dickinson: A First Impression, by Jason Rantanen (Iowa Law) & Lee Petherbridge (Loyola Law).[1406 downloads] A Generation of Software Patents, by James Bessen (Research on Innovation).[197 downloads] The Myth of the Sole Inventor, by Mark Lemley (Stanford Law).[190 downloads] Building a Collaborative Digital Collection, a Necessary Evolution in Libraries, by Michelle M. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 10:32 am
Allison & Mark A. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:05 am
Dan Burk, Mark Lemley, Inherency, 47 William & Mary Law Review 371 (2005). [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 7:06 pm
I'll offer a preliminary answer of my own:I start with the observation (credited to Mark Lemley) noted at TAN 176: "The lack of protection in some of these areas may be explicable as resulting from their nature as necessities: we all need clothes, haircuts, furniture, and good, and indeed the useful articles doctrine is aimed at ensuring that useful things are excised from copyright's domain. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:16 am
Mark Lemley and Mark McKenna’s article, “Irrelevant Confusion,” which I think is destined to become a watershed in trademark scholarship. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
Lemley: A.f. as a doctrinal/channeling device that maps to regular functionality: design patent and utility patent. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Citing both Dogan/Lemley and Dinwoodie/Janis is a good example: those articles don’t say the same thing. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
It viewed the former as being a mere product of nature and unpatentable, while the latter was deemed not naturally occurring and therefore patentable.Patentable Subject MatterThe first speaker of the day, Mark Janis, law professor at the University of Indiana, Bloomington, took a step back from the traditional view of eligibility. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
Footnote 131: Mark A. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In their article The Antibody Patent Paradox (2023), Mark Lemley and Jake Sherkow argue that the “full scope” requirement is poorly reflective of antibody science and threatens innovation. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
Lemley: What things go into cost and benefit buckets? [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 9:56 am
**Mark Lemley is also mentioned. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:28 pm
JAFFE & JOSH LERNER, INNOVATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS: HOW OUR BROKEN PATENT SYSTEM IS ENDANGERING INNOVATION AND PROGRESS, AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT 32-34 (2004); Mark Lemley et al., What to Do About Bad Patents, REGULATION, Winter 2005-2006, at 10, available at http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/lichtman/bad-patents.pdf. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:40 pm
The women have settled with three other anonymous defendants, says Mark Lemley, a professor at Stanford Law School who is also of counsel at Keker & Van Nest in the Bay Area. [read post]
