Search for: "Mark Strong" Results 661 - 680 of 10,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2007, 11:52 pm
The S and Star portion is still a "significant component of opposer's composite mark and it creates a strong visual impact apart from the word STARTER. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:56 am by Glenn Reynolds
MARK STEYN: AMERICA HAS SQUANDERED ITS OPPORTUNITY TO LEAD: I’ve been alarmed by the latest polls. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
Copyright Office Celebrates 150 Years of Fostering American Creativity and Innovation — Speaking of the US Copyright Office, it marked a notable anniversary this week. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 2:57 am
Mark Landler starts his New York Times article by reinforcing the stereotype about Europe being on vacation and then describes some criticism of the ECB's strong financial injections: The rest of Europe may be deep into its annual summer idyll, but the European Central Bank has been a hive of activity since last Thursday, when it thrust itself into a market rattled by fears of a credit crisis. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:08 am
They enter the ship with a thread that will mark their route and help them exit. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:00 am by Cathy Dahl
I always think it’s fun to look at lists of famous trademarks or summaries of what individuals perceive to be strong marks associated with various regions. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patently O has a discussion of a manuscript by Mark Lemley et al [ “Do Applicant Patent Citations Matter? [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
Moreover, Opposer also proved that its family of marks was sufficiently famous as early as 1986, prior to applicant's alleged first use of the applied-for mark in 1990.Considering the six "blurring" factors set forth in Section 43 (c)(2)(B)(i)-(vi), the Board found that applicant’s mark MCSWEET is "very similar to Opposer’s family of marks;" that the combination of the prefix "MC with a generic or descriptive food term is… [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm by Jay McDaniel
Courts give the greatest range of protection to strong and distinctive marks because they present a greater likelihood that consumers will associate it any other similar marks with the owner. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
In other words, if you are registering signs that are used like collective marks as individual marks, you risk losing your mark for lack of use after the five year non-use period. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:53 pm by Tom
Indeed, strong similarity, or even identity, between two the appearance of two marks can dominate the analysis and reduce the need for similarity in the other factors. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 7:56 pm by Steve Shiffrin
Gary Hart you may remember was the front runner for the Democratic nomination and a strong favorite to win the Presidency in 1988. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:12 am by Dennis Crouch
— Dennis Crouch (@patentlyo) June 30, 2020 The difference: In trademark law Justice Breyer dissented against the 8-1 majority supported strong IP rights and focused on the booking dot com mark "as a whole" In patent law the 9-0 court agreed with Breyer. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:35 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"That’s a pretty strong deterrent to software plaintiffs whose patent isn’t directed to specific new computer technology. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 10:47 am
Speaking of other uses for a law degree, if you still haven't checked out Bloomberg Law's Stealth Lawyers series here, it's still going strong (if the link doesn't work, try searching YouTube for "Bloomberg Law Stealth Lawyers", without the quotation marks). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:34 am
Strong, Mandatory Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes – Improving Arbitrability and Enforceability through Proper Procedural ChoicesLucy Greenwood & C. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 5:16 pm by Howard Friedman
 As pictured and described in a report on the lawsuit by NJ Advance Media, the memorial depicts a soldier kneeling over a grave marked by a cross. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2000) (finding the Board’s failure to consider consumer sophistication harmless when there was a strong similarity of marks and identity of goods). [read post]