Search for: "Matter of Perez"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
A very brief analysis of Perez, should you be charged with or arrested for Third Degree Assault, this case may be one you or your criminal lawyer should be familiar with. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am
Although the Hold Orders make no specific reference to a grand jury inquiry, they do advise the recipient that there is `a pending or anticipated legal matter’ and taking certain actions, including destroying, materials covered by the Hold Order `may subject individuals or BP to prosecution or other severe consequences. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:03 pm
Allenson, J.D. and Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
8 May 2013, 12:59 am
Key graf from the article: "Right-wing media continue their relentless campaign to undermine the Labor Secretary nomination of Thomas Perez, pushing the baseless claim that he acted unethically in his involvement with... [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:23 pm
In the five remaining cases, which we’ll discuss next, the court did not hold that the label was adequate as a matter of law. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:29 pm
The company fired Perez after learning about the post. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:45 am
The timing for publishing any finalized regulations will depend on several factors including when and whether the Senate confirms the President’s pending nomination of Thomas Perez (currently head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division) to replace Hilda Solis as the Secretary of Labor. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:15 am
Perez, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:11 am
I claim no special expertise in CFIUS matters, but isn’t #1 a little weird? [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:10 pm
Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447-48 (Tex. 2011); Nazareth Hall Nursing Ctr. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:10 pm
Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447-48 (Tex. 2011); Nazareth Hall Nursing Ctr. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:14 am
Perez which was decided by the court sometime in 2005, plaintiff failed to rebut defendant’s claim sufficiently to raise a trial issue of fact. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
Tone matters. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 1:19 pm
Lara, that Congress has the power to “lift or relax” restrictions on tribal jurisdiction over criminal matters. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm
Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 448-49 (Tex. 2011) (explaining that section 51.016 provides for interlocutory appeals in FAA cases so long as "it would be permitted under the same circumstances in federal court under section 16"). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm
Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 448-49 (Tex. 2011) (explaining that section 51.016 provides for interlocutory appeals in FAA cases so long as "it would be permitted under the same circumstances in federal court under section 16"). [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 8:02 am
”); In re Luce, 304 F.2d 899, 901 (CCPA 1962) (similar, citing Richards); In re Miller, 197 F.2d 340, 341 (CCPA 1952) (similar, citing Richards).Separately, as to analogous art:“‘A reference is reasonably pertinent if, even though it may be in a different field from that of the inventor’s endeavor, it is one which, because of the matter with which it deals, logically would have commended itself to an inventor’s attention in considering his problem. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 1:39 am
In addition, Perez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
Perez, and another in a case with a pending cert. petition, Lepak v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:40 am
James and an attorney remain in control of all of her financial matters. [read post]
