Search for: "Miller v. Deal" Results 661 - 680 of 1,127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d 73, 85-86 [2d Cir 2001]; Johnson v Kennedy, 350 Mass 294, 298, 214 NE2d 276, 278 [1966]; Posner v Miller, 356 Mich 6, 9, 96 NW2d 110, 111-112 [1959]; Nicholes v Hunt, 273 Or 255, 261-262, 541 P2d 820, 823-824 [1975]; Willman v Beheler, 499 SW2d 770, 775 [Mo 1973]; Fisher v Fisher, 83 Cal App 2d 357, 360, 188 P2d 802, 804 [1948]). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
  Presenting a European Union perspective was Monika Tomczak-Gorlikowska (Miller Canfield). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:20 am by Venkat
The court was faced with the question of whether the statute covered content that was obscene as defined by the Miller v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by SJM
OK, so the title of this post may be an exaggeration of what is only a passing reference to an old friend in Fareham BC v Miller [2013] EWCA Civ 159. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by SJM
OK, so the title of this post may be an exaggeration of what is only a passing reference to an old friend in Fareham BC v Miller [2013] EWCA Civ 159. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:27 pm by Anna Gelpern
Mark makes an immensely important point in his post on the latest in NML v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  Does that tell you – a light bulb doesn’t go off in your head and say, This is a drug deal? [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Ross Davies
Miller, McIntyre in Context: A Very Personal Perspective, 63 South Carolina Law Review 465 (2012) - Carol Sanger, “The Birth of Death”: Stillborn Birth Certificates and the Problem for Law, 100 California Law Review 269 (2012) V. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Of course, taxes aren't the only thing that can kill a company's bottom line - regulations hurt too, and as Henry Miller notes in a recent op-ed, they're getting increasingly worse: Stultifying, job-killing regulation has been a hallmark of the Obama administration. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 11:47 am by Bart Torvik
" The current standard on obscenity, set out in Miller v. [read post]