Search for: "Nerds in Court"
Results 661 - 680
of 796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2010, 1:13 am
But don't celebrate too hard if your answers put you in the prom king/queen range, because The Snark says you'll survive longer as a nerd. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:26 am
(I don’t want the antitrust nerds who read these technical posts — and here’s to you, dweeby friends! [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm
(Dalia Ramirez, Nerd Wallet). [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:02 am
Under the government’s demand that it be given everything, the government leaves the Court with only two options: deny the warrants — thus depriving the government of needed information — or issue warrants that are repugnant to the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
No, he’s not a lawyer, but hey, he writes for Ars, so shouldn’t he be explaining law to nerds? [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:33 pm
Because an unconstitutional law is no law at all,Defendant Edward Myers shall go hence without day.And for you grammar nerds, check out footnote one of the opinion:Many courts and commentators, especially in the passagesquoted herein, render the possessive of "Congress" as "Congress'. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:14 am
Consider the real life scenario that invariably eludes academics and those who think Supreme Court decisions are the coolest things ever. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
So after about 20 hours of research and dissecting all the transactions (remember, I'm a novice at all of this plus a bit of a research nerd), I filed a motion to dismiss, and I'll be in court next month to argue it. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
The damning language from the court's opinion relates to the issue of a state law negligence claim its relation to the FFIEC Guidelines. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
” The eldest child, teenage slacker Eddie, concluded with a sage nod, “You know, once in a while, it’s good to know nerds. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Law nerds (that means both of our readers) take note: lost among all the headlines was the fact that the opinion contains great language about not construing ambiguous language to be jurisdictional. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 11:05 am
In December 2023 and February 2024, he urged the Supreme Court to hear Mr. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 6:58 am
The Court also found that the defendants had “blown [the issue] out of proportion” even though there was no prejudice. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:04 am
I’m going to get into the minutiae of the opinion, so unless you are a hardcore domain name/trademark nerd, you should probably stop reading here. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:42 pm
After all, the government is just submitting the application; it's the court's order if the court signs on. [read post]
20 Sep 2006, 7:31 pm
This concept, the book argues, applies to courts as well. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:31 am
(Well, ok, but the decision was a big deal for us law nerds.) [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm
As Fourth Amendment nerds know, the law of reasonableness often applies differently in these four settings. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:26 am
To a property owners' lawyer, and an admitted property law nerd, to participate in this conference is like a baseball fan being offered the chance for an at-bat at Yankee Stadium in October. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:05 pm
Still, press coverage of cases like this tends to focus just on the sexual relationship and not on the several other counts, including misrepresenting the situation to courts and the OLR.So, what to do? [read post]
