Search for: "Nichols v. Nichols"
Results 661 - 680
of 860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2022, 4:04 am
” Nichols v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
The panel rationalized that alien IDs were merely digital placeholders allowing agency officials to trace immigrants, the value of which outweighed the burden of substituting functionally equivalent, non-exempt placeholders.AB: Requiring an agency to create identifiers that did not previously exist strikes me as the creation of a “new” record, which is precisely what the estimable Judge Nichols held in Institute for Justice v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am
ZDNet's Steven Vaughan-Nichols, who likes open source far better than patents, thinks the PAI is, for the time being, "foggy on the details".It's not purely a coincidence that Apple would take a more active role than ever before in patent policy during the opening week of the Apple v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 12:41 pm
Also, see Nichols v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
We can find no clearer statement of judicial antipathy to expert witness advocacy than the famous copyright decision by Judge Learned Hand in Nichols v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 11:59 am
Introducing his summary of the relevant cases with a recap of Von Hannover (and clarifying that the decision only related to the more anoydne, non-official photographs in the controversial case), Carolan discussed Pfeifer v Austria. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
Brady v Norman [2011] EWCA Civ 107 – 9 Feb 2011. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
Tran v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, No. 13-1041; and Nichols v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
HOME, Link v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, No. 13-1041; and Nichols v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:25 am
Board of Ed. ruling, and the district court decision in Nichol v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
In Eck v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
The Court also re-listed for a second time in Nichols v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Rochow v. [read post]
