Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 6,176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently though, the Court stated in 2014 in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
No. 2412 paras 79 – 109; R v Brown 2003 CanLII 52142 (ON CA), [2003] OJ No 1251; Peart vs PRP 2006 CanLII 37566 (ON CA), [2006] OJ No 4457; R v Dudhi 2019 ONCA 665 (CanLII), [2019] O.J No 4333; and R v Sitladeen 2021 ONCA 303. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
The basis on which equity grants relief from the strict enforcement of a forfeiture is that it regards the forfeiture as only a security for the performance of an underlying obligation: see Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding (1973) AC 691, 723-724 per Lord Wilberforce, recently affirmed by this court in Vauxhall Motors Ltd (formerly General Motors UK Ltd) v Manchester Ship Canal Co Ltd (2019) UKSC 46; (2020) AC 1161, para 17. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In another recent decision in Ontario, Ontario v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am by Oscar Davies and Jack Castle
In R (on the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56, [2021] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), the Supreme Court found there was no positive obligation on the state to provide the option of an ‘X’ gender category on passports. [read post]