Search for: "People v May"
Results 661 - 680
of 44,072
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
Many people may not know that under New York law it is unlawful to discriminate against an employee who is in the military. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:50 pm
To see the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department decisions (including index) released on May 22, 2008, click on the links below Appeals Index - Decisions Released - Motion Index Slip Opinions for May 22, 2008 People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 11:40 am
Other than AT&T v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
(See Butz v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 5:11 pm
The appellant in in People v Magliocco ( [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:56 am
How creative do officials have to get in depriving people of their rights until courts and the people say it has become downright bizarre? [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 1:29 am
William McDougald v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 3:53 am
People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 pm
The more modern case of Nicholson v Nicholson, 199 N. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
A week ago today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Texas case called Salinas v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:50 am
On 19 May 2023, Mrs Justice Heather Williams handed down judgment in Prismall v Google UK Limited & Another [2023] EWHC 1169 (KB). [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 9:51 am
In People v Mack, 2007 NY Slip Op 02824, the defendant was initially assigned counsel for pending felony murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 2:14 am
Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 11:06 am
In People v Faulkner, 2007 NY Slip Op 00338, the voir dire was not fully transcribed--to the defendant's benefit. [read post]
31 May 2009, 7:31 am
Decker Complaint) on May 27, 2009, charging that the government is violating the law by incarcerating people for prolonged periods of time, sometimes... [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:43 pm
Talk about being unknowingly prescient . . . .This opinion was issued on May 12, 2020. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
Here's what he says:"Doe entered the women’s restroom, which has two stalls, a small one and a larger one for people with disabilities. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:41 am
And that guys like this may well be suspicious.But still. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am
Summers v. [read post]
