Search for: "People v. District Court of State" Results 661 - 680 of 14,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2015, 6:36 am by Earl Drott
Since only the federal courts have jurisdiction in FTCA cases, the state court – and, consequently, the federal district court, which derived its jurisdiction from the state court – lacked jurisdiction over the case. [read post]
In 2020, the US District Court for the District of Oregon Medford Division ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, stating that the current language of the municipal code violated the 8th Amendment. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 8:04 am by Howard Friedman
Cuomo, (ND NY, Aug. 7, 2020), a New York federal district court preliminarily enjoined enforcement of a COVID-19 50-person limit on weddings when they are held in a restaurant which is allowed to seat more people when operating for dining. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 4:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the time of defendant's trial, polygraph tests had not been proven to be reliable as held in People v Leone. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 3:55 pm by Joe Austin, E.D. Tenn.
After initially deciding the case in an unpublished order, the Sixth Circuit later ordered publication of its decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:08 am by Andrew Tidwell-Neal
The United States Supreme Court recently handed down its decision in Kentucky v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am by SHG
Bratton, and the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 10:57 am by Ilya Somin
CDC is the second district court ruling against the moratorium. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 5:46 am
Here is a link to the announcement: Starting today, we're enabling people everywhere to find and read full text legal opinions from U.S. federal and state district, appellate and supreme courts using Google Scholar. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:01 am by Marc Climaco
On Monday the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
For the reasons that follow, we affirm.Of the people involved:Dr. [read post]