Search for: "People v. Pack"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,086
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:26 am
The entire fairness standard, first set forth in the decision in Weinberger v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 1:09 am
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 74, no. 1, 2014) is out. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari to address the issue in Wurie and a similar case, People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:03 pm
They are also a way for injured people to be compensated, since the drunk driver usually lacks significant insurance or assets, if he has them at all. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
(citing Jackson v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Tracking people with GPS devices raises privacy issues. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 2:56 pm
But magistrates are still prone to adopting large chunks of other people’s documents wholesale – guardian’s report, case summary, whatever. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am
For example, in Stern v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 11:52 pm
By Nicole KilloranState v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:20 pm
The voters recently reformed the Three Strikes Law to potentially lower sentences for people who didn't commit violent felonies as their third strike. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 3:00 pm
(Compare People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:56 am
Bouchat v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:25 am
The court noted that a large enough sample of workers will contain people with idiosyncratic susceptibilities. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:30 am
It was a great talk to a packed house. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:41 am
Last week was packed full of advocacy. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Too much transparency defeats the very purpose of democracy; Third, applying these concepts to the consideration of NSA surveillance leads me to the following conclusions (and here I have selected only a few of the most prominent proposals for discussion): An in-house advocate before the FISA court, called at the court’s discretion, might improve decision-making; Data retention rules and distributed databases will be ineffective and no more privacy protective; Post-collection judicial… [read post]
