Search for: "People v. Score" Results 661 - 680 of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2016, 5:08 am by Amy Howe
The National Immigration Law Center has an explainer on United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:33 pm by Jon Katz
Katz has successfully defended scores of people charged with sex-related crimes, and thousands of criminal defendants since 1991. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
District Judge George Caram Steeh's ruling that the government legally can require uninsured people to purchase coverage.The judge had denied the group's request for an injunction against a provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
  The actual scoring method is also a problem. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 1:59 pm by Hannah Kris
Sixteen people were killed in the assault, and 40 were hospitalized. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:28 pm by Khiara M. Bridges
(Justice Brennan cited it in his dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]