Search for: "Petition of Smith" Results 661 - 680 of 3,019
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2020, 1:11 pm by Jon Sands
  This is an affirmance of a capital petition dismissal. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:24 am by SHG
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Biden Plans to Stay Home, Testing Limits of Virtual Campaign AP News – Bill Barrow and Steve Peoples | Published: 5/12/2020 Joe Biden has no foreseeable plans to resume in-person campaigning amid a pandemic that is testing whether a national presidential election can be won by a candidate communicating almost entirely from home. [read post]
10 May 2020, 8:01 am by Russell Knight
Child support orders get entered in Illinois when two parents divorce or establish paternity. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Sineneng-Smith back to the lower court, which it ruled had impermissibly broadened the scope of the case when it struck down a federal law making it a crime to encourage or induce illegal immigration for financial gain. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
The District Court resolved the case on narrow grounds: In the District Court, Sineneng-Smith urged unsuccessfully, inter alia, that the above-cited provisions, properly construed, did not cover her conduct, and if they did, they violated the Petition and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment as applied. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am by Shea Denning
A dissenting judge would have concluded that the trial court had authority to enter the order and that the appellate court was without jurisdiction to reach the merits of the petitioner’s claims as the petition was not an aggrieved party to the proceeding from which he appealed. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:19 pm by jlucivero
On April 27, 2020, in a unanimous opinion by the Court of Appeals, Faulkner’s and Smith’s petitions for writs of actual innocence were granted. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
Accordingly, Biddle—without parsing the language of the statute—concluded that Roosevelt could use Section 3 of Smith-Connally to seize Montgomery Ward. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Under Griffith, Smith but not Jones receives the benefit of the new rule, even though the respective alleged conduct and trials were simultaneous. [read post]