Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips" Results 661 - 680 of 4,222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society blog, James Phillips explains why the pending cert petition in Kerpen v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:23 am by Thomas Baer
They supported their argument with the Supreme Court decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:54 am
First up is a summary of Phillips appeal regarding Philips’ Standard Essential European Patent EP 1 623 511 for a ‘Communication System’. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:47 pm
” After the car was repossessed and Dealer’s manager told Phillips the loan was denied, Phillips requested a refund of her down payment. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:00 am by Phillips & Associates
Supreme Court first recognized sexual harassment as a violation of federal antidiscrimination law in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”‘ (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II, LP., v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimp, LLP, 265 AD2d at 210.) [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 10:24 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
Although it didn’t call it that, the concept of “sex plus” discrimination was first adopted by the United States Supreme Court in a 1971 decision involving Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in the case of Phillips v. [read post]