Search for: "Points v. Points"
Results 661 - 680
of 91,148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm
Important analysis of how the SCOTUS may miss the point. [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:22 am
A recent case in point is the British Columbia Court of Appeal decision in Doucette v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 1:50 pm
"V" is for Virginia. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 10:26 am
[a]t some point we will have to draw lines in the sand; enough is enough. . . . [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:19 pm
Reuters covered the oral argument in Teva v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
See Garcia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:15 am
The judge pointed out to Mr. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:17 pm
The meaning of the statute was most recently explicated by the Supreme Court in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:02 pm
Batson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:18 am
JD (Congo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Public Law Project intervening); WN (The Gambia) v Same; ES (Iran) v Same; MR (Bangladesh) v Same [2012] EWCA Civ 327; [2012] WLR (D) 85 “Where a claimant who had succeeded before the First-tier Tribunal but failed in the Upper Tribunal sought permission to appeal from the Upper Tribunal, not on the ground of an important point of principle or practice, but for some other compelling reason… [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 3:42 am
A tip off from WOIP blog that the long awaited suit by Tiffany's against eBay for trademark infringement - basically, stocking counterfeit Tiffany goods - is about to kick off.http://woip.blogspot.com/2007/11/tiffany-versus-ebay.htmlGiven recent cases in France and Germany which have tentatively pointed towards a trend towards European judges not finding the EC E Commerce Directive Art 14 a complete defense for user generated content sites, this one could be very interesting :) [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
The most notable modern flash point is the evolution/creationism debate, which seems to rage anew every few years as the creationists reboot and come up [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:32 pm
On June 19, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:58 pm
Christopher Hill, State Strategies Coordinator for the Capital Punishment Project, points this out in today's HuffingtonPost in the case of Dr. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm
I want to briefly interrupt the hubbub over Kirtsaeng (which I fully intend to contribute to at some point) to note that last week the Ninth Circuit released an updated opinion in UMG Recordings v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:00 pm
Last month I blogged about “Intentional Interference With Expected Inheritance“. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 1:42 am
Ranbaxy (UK) Ltd. v AstraZeneca AB [2011] EWHC 1831 (Pat) (15 July 2011) raises an interesting point on the interpretation of claims. [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:50 am
This point was underscored yet again in the recent case of Milam v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:19 pm
I offer a couple of quick additional points: First, my characterization of how the majority of SCOTUS perceives what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did in 2020 (in… Continue reading The post A brief follow-up on Moore v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:43 am
(Todd Zywicki) At one point someone had posted several photographs related to the case of Williams v. [read post]
