Search for: "Robert v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 19,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 8:12 pm by Lawrence Solum
Although Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion is predicated on the need to have judges with life tenure to ensure judicial independence, it is difficult to see why this should matter for state law claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor and Kagan joined the majority opinion. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor and Kagan joined the majority opinion. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In an Order in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:55 am
Regardless, the quote suggests itself as the inspiration behind the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California‘s charging decision in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:14 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Castro-Huerta -- Rebalancing Federal-State-Tribal Power Stacy Leeds, Robert J. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:31 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday we flagged two amicus briefs filed on behalf of the petitioner in al-Bahlul v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by JB
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion relies primarily on the 1982 5-4 decision in Nixon v. [read post]