Search for: "Rogers v. United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2015, 8:38 pm
The court cites to United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm
Frum may not have noticed that he is a tapping into a classic episode in United States Constitutional history. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm
United States, and I have very little of substance to add to Jen Daskal’s thorough analysis over at Just Security, or Marty Lederman’s addendum thereto. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am
Justice Roger Traynor’s classic concurrence in Escola v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
Unit A Feb. 1981)). [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm
As we have seen over the last year, the bulk collection of citizens’ phone records has driven a national debate about the proper role of surveillance in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm
” On 2 July 2024, some arrived with placards stating: “Jurors have an absolute right to acquit a defendant according to their conscience. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
All of the opinions in NFIB v. [read post]
Top 10 military justice stories of 2008 -- #4: The President's approval of a military death sentence
31 Dec 2008, 10:35 am
Then Gray sought a pre-habeas petition stay of execution from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, which Senior Judge Rogers granted. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 1:07 pm
They want to stay in the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
The Court largely endorsed that logic two terms back in Harris v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
When Ralls filed suit alleging violations of due process and the Administrative Procedure Act, President Obama himself issued a similar order demanding that Ralls divest and stating that he had “credible evidence” that Ralls’ actions might “impair the national security of the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:43 am
On Friday, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction against Apple only with respect to its developer account for Unreal Engine, but it's still up to Epic itself to #FreeFortnite, though Epic's aggressive attitude makes a Ninth Circuit decision likely to be inevitable before the iOS version of Fortnite will return to the App Store.Late on… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:34 am
United States, 510 U.S. 163 (1994), which is “whether the factors militating in favor of [the proposed rule] are so extraordinarily weighty as to overcome the balance struck by Congress. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:39 am
” Courthouse News Service also reports on briefs filed in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:54 am
Rogers v. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 9:07 pm
In the now-famous NCAA v. [read post]
