Search for: "STANFORD v. STANFORD" Results 661 - 680 of 3,147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 6:05 pm
The Stanford Daily has an article covering law professor Jeffrey Fisher, who recently argued Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
Supreme Court's decision not to decide whether the plaintiffs in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:20 pm
See alsoOrder issued in UTexas(Goodenough) v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Joe Mullin writes of the Supreme Court on Bilski:Whichever side Stevens is on, the long delay likely means there is disagreement among the justices, says Stanford Law professor Mark Lemley. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 10:45 am
On Tuesday, October 13, the Court will hear arguments in No. 08-651, Padilla v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:00 am
(Though there's controversy today about exactly what happened - including the fact that Stanford's band were on the field, in the end zone during the play. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 3:43 pm
Stanford Law School student Barbara Thomas provides the following recap of Thursday’s decision in No. 06-923, MetLife v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
On Monday, March 19, the Justices will hear oral argument in Wilkie v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 8:01 am
On Monday, the Court heard argument in EC Term of Years Trust v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:53 pm
  But the Tenth Circuit allegedly did the same thing, albeit in a Section 2 (monopolization) case, rather than a Section 1 (conspiracy) case as here.I know a little bit about that because I published a long piece in the Stanford Law Review entitled Intracorporate Conspiracies that talks a lot about the underlying principle. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Here's Stanford's press release. [read post]