Search for: "STATE v. GAY"
Results 661 - 680
of 4,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2019, 4:10 am
In Ferguson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:10 am
In Lloyd v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 5:50 pm
Contents include:Chuanju Cheng, Securing the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Case of Taiwan and Hunting Kimberly Theidon, Guerrilla Governance: Troubling Gender in the FARC Douglas Pretsell & Timothy Willem Jones, How Human Rights Became Gay Rights: A History of Toonen v Australia Jenna Norosky & Charli Carpenter, The Right to Flee the Dangers of War: Rethinking Ukraine’s Gender-Based Restriction on Civilian Men’s Freedom of Movement Juan Pablo… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:06 pm
In short, these amici tend to acknowledge that the Court to which they are making their plea is not the Court that in 1986 issued Bowers v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:35 pm
This decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:06 pm
Example 4: You're currently serving in the United States military and are a member of a Christian religion. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Gay. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Gay. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
These articles concern Judge Vaugn Walker's denial of a summary judgment motion in Perry v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:30 am
She states that she now knows that she can marry a princess. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:50 pm
According to this notice, the Supreme Court will issue its decision in Perry v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 11:50 am
Ruling unanimously on December 11, a panel of the Court of Appeals of Minnesota held in P.G.M. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:49 pm
Even today, substantially more than 1/2 the states don’t protect gay workers from discrimination based on sexual orientation — but New York State does, so he’d be better off in that way. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm
Post-gay, ex-gay and proud. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 11:42 am
Although Boies and Olson also argue that Prop. 8 fails to satisfy the "rational basis" standard of constitutionality, the ACLU and NCLR examine the unique circumstances under which it does:Considering the unique circumstances surrounding its enactment and stated intent of stripping same-sex couples of the status of mariage while leaving intact all of the other substantive rights of same-sex couples, the sole purpose of Proposition 8 manifestly is to establish a declaration of the… [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
Well, in Simonton v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 am
Part 4: Palmore v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:30 am
The case is Klepetko v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:58 am
See, Montana v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:09 pm
Here in the United States, for example, the Supreme Court ruled in 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]
