Search for: "Samples v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 4:08 pm
In People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
Nelson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
[N]either Linder [v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:05 pm
United States government and 21 other amicus briefs back i4i in U.S. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:00 am
Compare Dynasty Sample Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:27 pm
Starting with two states, New York and Massachusetts, through parallel examinations of a sample of national banks by the OCC, and examinations of a sample of state-licensed mortgage brokers by each state, we hope to develop a baseline of useful compliance information resulting from this unique congruence of state and federal jurisdictional interests.[...]I want to emphasize that I am hopeful ??? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:07 am
As to the Supreme Court decision in Teva v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
The sixth circuit court made a decision about sampling which again altered the way it was governed in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:17 pm
Pfaff v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:09 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:22 am
These courses provide sample test materials and live or digital legal education and practical advice for passing the test in each state. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:30 pm
CAAF granted review today in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:54 am
” At Notice and Comment, Michael Kagan has “initial reactions” to the federal government’s opening brief in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:38 am
State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:51 pm
The SOE’s self-review was based on the company’s alleged failure to: submit a sample that complied with the tender requirements; submit the test results of the tender sample, which was a pre-condition of the contract; and install the fence according to the tender specifications. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:50 am
Bd. of Health v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
The opinion, Prometheus v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Garcia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
