Search for: "Sellers v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
The seller’s warning must be reasonably calculated to reach such persons, and the presence of an intermediate party will not by itself relieve the seller of this duty. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Daniel Snare
  "Domestic transactions" under Section 10(b) are defined as "purchases and sales of securities explicitly solicited by the issuer within the United States rather than transactions in foreign-traded securities where the ultimate purchaser or seller has physically remained in the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 2:15 am by Carol Wilkinson
Sheriff Tierney followed Sherriff Principal Reid’s opinion in United Dominions Trust Ltd v Tylor 1980 SLT (Sh Ct) 28 and held that s 75(1) of the CAA entitled Mr Durkin to rescind both the sale contract and credit agreement. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:26 pm by Mike
For many years PTI imported Singha Beer into the United States under an agreement with BRTI. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:23 am
Byrne discussed the United States Fair Housing Act and a recent decision regarding its application to 'companion animals'. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm by Jennifer Ko
Supreme Court decisions: Hughes v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:55 am by Thomas James
The United States Constitution, however, also protects rights of speech and press freedom. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Karis Stephen
In the United States, multiple federal bodies develop and enforce e-commerce counterfeit goods regulations. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 1:42 pm by Bill Stalter
   The Supreme Court has expressed concerns how the facial challenge might be used to undermine the legislative process, and accordingly, the challenging party is held to a higher standard of proof:  To succeed in a typical facial attack, [the respondent] would have to establish “that no set of circumstances exists under which [the statute] would be valid”, United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:47 am by Peter Vodola
   * * * This industry gained traction in the United States during the late 1980s, when the AIDS pandemic peaked. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
The Supreme Court's broad and inclusive approach to exhaustion simply doesn't allow any kind of end-run around the exhaustion doctrine through a first sale outside the United States as in one of the two issues relevant in the Lexmark case. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]