Search for: "Smith v. People"
Results 661 - 680
of 3,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
The Supreme Court of California recently upheld the warrantless search of a cell phone text message folder in People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
A provision added by Proposition 59 states: “The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business, and, therefore, . [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:45 am
“This is something that could be powerful,” said Abhijit V. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
David Smith: Hi. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 4:05 am
Even before Smith, Aubrey Strode, the lawyer for the state in Buck v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:15 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, the Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 1:35 am
However, accidents often leave people with fatal injuries. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Marks tells all.* Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not overAfter many posts on Smith & Nephew v Convatec (Court of Appeal judgment here, here, and here; first instance judgment of Mr Justice Birss here), Neil covers the last episodes of the series, both in the UK and in Eponia.* Best thing since sliced bread -- or even better? [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
Which makes sense, and I agree is required by Rule 11.P.S. - Looks to me like there's confusion about dates in Judge Smith's opinion. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 12:02 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 1:59 pm
Supreme Court of Illinois: The People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:49 am
Smith (Assimilative Crimes Act; Indian Country Crimes Act)Kim R. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm
Smith (Criminal Jurisdiction; Indian Pueblo Land Act Amendments of 2005) United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:55 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged about the case a year ago, and now there’s an appellate court decision in it, People v. [read post]
