Search for: "Spelling v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am
States have not always done a good job of spelling out what is meant by “convenience,” but generally the only exceptions are for when an employee’s work legitimately could not be carried out in the employer’s state. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
Net MoneyIn, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:56 am
In the controversial Texas v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:57 pm
The Washington state case — State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
| Firings will continue until morale improves - Merpel revisits the EPO| Never Too Late 121 [week ending on Sunday 6 November] | Sunday Surprises | Firings will continue until morale improves - Merpel revisits the EPO | Will too much of one and not enough of the other spell bad news for innovation? [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
For example, in Matter of the Board of Education of the Unadilla Valley Central School District, 97 AD3d 1078, the Appellate Division held that a disciplinary settlement agreement that provided that the appointing authority waived its right to bring certain charges against an individual barred it from subsequently bring charges based on the same event[s] or omission[s] while in Shuler v State of New York, 48 AD3d 384, the court sustained a provision in a disciplinary… [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:09 am
We blogged about this case, Holland v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 11:23 pm
That framing spelled trouble for the challengers. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:23 am
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
Case Citation: Blatt v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:11 am
In Candelario v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 8:50 am
That is in form exactly the same rationale that the Court has used in the past -- most notably, in Austin v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:23 pm
In Colter v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm
Vullo, which addressed similar indirect coercion by New York state officials. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
The decision was based on the new interpretive approach announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:37 pm
The Court spelled out with some clarity why the policy was almost certainly unlawful. [read post]
22 May 2016, 11:16 am
In reacting to the Apple II, Ken Olson, founder of Digital Equipment Corp. stated, "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 5:27 am
Updated for spelling. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 3:49 am
ABC v. [read post]
