Search for: "State of Maryland v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 3,230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Secretary of State of Maryland v Munson, 467 U.S. 947, 955, 104 S Ct 2839, 81 L. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:08 pm
Watts Holding: Docket entries not otherwise subject to shielding that are unclear, ambiguous, or unavailable to the public via the Judiciary’s online case search fail to satisfy the requirements of Maryland Rule 2-601(b)(3) and do not trigger the 8-202(a) thirty-day appeal period.Recordation and indexing of a federal judgment creates a lien, not a new judgment.Facts: In 2002, Petitioner (“Lender”) obtained a default judgment in the United… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Orin Kerr
According to Judge Leon, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 7:53 pm by Kenneth S. Nankin
Note:  Qatar Airways successfully used a similar subject matter jurisdiction argument in a Maryland case (Alemi v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 7:53 pm by Kenneth S. Nankin
Note:  Qatar Airways successfully used a similar subject matter jurisdiction argument in a Maryland case (Alemi v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 11:02 am by Anthony Gaughan
The most important election law case before the United States Supreme Court this term is Gill v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:15 am by Rebecca Jeschke
Kidane in order to protect the safety and wellbeing of his family both in the United States and in Ethiopia. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:52 am by John Bratt
The trial court's ruling was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Filed: June 29, 2022Holding: A Maryland statute that allowed certain beer, wine, and liquor license holders in a certain area of a legislative district to exchange their licenses for other licenses under certain circumstances and restricted the hours of operation for certain licensees in a separate area of the same legislative district did not violate the one subject requirement in Article III, § 29 of the Maryland Constitution and was not shown to violate equal… [read post]