Search for: "State v. Back"
Results 661 - 680
of 42,081
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2022, 2:08 pm
(AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) If, as seems likely, the Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
This term, the sleeper case is Department of State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Dunham v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
On June 26, 2019 the Supreme Court of the United States issued a 9-0 decision in the case of Kisor v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
On June 26, 2019 the Supreme Court of the United States issued a 9-0 decision in the case of Kisor v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
John Witte, Emory University School of Law, has published Back to the Sources? [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
John Witte, Emory University School of Law, has published Back to the Sources? [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
The issue arose way back in 1981 with the case of McCarty v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:22 pm
Back on November 9, I wrote: Could the Flipping of the North Carolina Supreme Court to Republican Control Moot the Moore v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 4:57 am
Carney, or Balifornia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
In Quesada v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 12:26 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
The Montana Supreme court pushed back against unlimited campaign spending by upholding the state Corrupt Practices Act, saying that Montana has a unique history of political corruption from the days of the copper kings. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:33 pm
Back in 2004, in the Hamdi case, Justice Thomas cited Hirabayashi v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:55 am
New York is the only state to choose candidates through a convention system that that many say harkens back to the days of Tammany Hall and machine politics. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
However, I nonetheless agree with the Majority at bottom that Plaintiffs had minimally sufficient standing under our liberal jurisprudential standing requirements to assert the claims at issue, and that the recent legislative attempts at issue to pare back the generally required scope of MEPA review is unconstitutional in violation of the Mont. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:55 am
On March 12, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:49 pm
Gladstone v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
United States v. [read post]