Search for: "State v. Bible" Results 661 - 680 of 843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
Heritage Music Foundation (TTABlog) Precedential no. 4: TTAB finds that “NKJV” has acquired distinctiveness for bibles: In re Thomas Nelson, Inc (TTABlog) Precedential no. 3: Finding KUBA KUBA primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive for cigars, TTAB affirms 2(e)(3) refusal: In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate (TTABlog) Precedential no. 2: TTAB cancels supplemental registration for shape of culvert unit due to functionality: Kistner Concrete Products, Inc.… [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Federation of German Consumer Organisation (VZBV) has filed a claim in Berlin’s state court claiming that WhatsApp “collects and stores data in part illegally and passes them on to Facebook”. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:00 am by admin
In the 1982 Supreme Court case, Plyler v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Otuo v Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Britain [2017] EWCA Civ 136. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:49 pm by Kevin
This question has been raised in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Privacy International has released a report: “Teach ‘em to Phish: State Sponsors of Surveillance” reviewing the approaches of governments to providing surveillance equipment to other countries. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
Whether it falls under that line of cases will depend on some further facts, as State of Oregon v Rajneeshpuram shows. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:02 am by Robert Destro
Galloway and Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:50 am by Mark Zamora
Other states' rulings and opinions:Zimmerman v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:23 am
  Oh, by the way, did I mention that father had moved out of state? [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Thomas gave us the answer in his opening paragraph in his brutal dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
None of them, from Shakespeare to the Bible, has to be distributed with a warning label. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
What will America become if, as reported, the five most conservative members of the US Supreme Court angrily and emphatically overrule Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:38 pm by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
For example, if I'm hiring someone to sell Bibles, I can restrict my hiring to those who believe as I do. [read post]