Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2010, 10:52 am
Title: State of South Carolina v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
The European Court of Justice (the “ECJ”) has handed down its judgment in a key, long-running TUPE case – Alemo-Herron v Parkwood Leisure Ltd. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:18 pm
Well, let's examine a case that will serve as a good illustration of these two charges: People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
We have previously covered the changes to housing benefit (HB) introduced by the Con-Dems and the DCLG’s concerns over them as well as those of certain London boroughs. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
We have previously covered the changes to housing benefit (HB) introduced by the Con-Dems and the DCLG’s concerns over them as well as those of certain London boroughs. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:55 am
The decision is Hejl v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners Plc. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
So, only a day or so late… A v London Borough of Croydon [2009] EWHC 939 (Admin) is a significant case in a long and convoluted saga. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Unsurprisingly, the Divisional Court followed the clear ruling by the House of Lords in Kay v London Borough of Lambeth [2006] AC 465 that domestic rules of precedent applied. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:40 pm
Borough of Englewood Cliffs Bd. of Adjustment, 361 N.J. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
(PBA) were elected to four-year terms as the sole borough-wide PBA representatives for police officers assigned to the Bronx. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 9:06 am
Mitchum v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm
Borough of Morrisville, 130 F.R.D. 612, 614 (E.D. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:25 am
The judge then cited a helpful passage from Carnwath LJ in R(Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government: 32. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:28 pm
"* The decision indicates that DOI was investigating the content of Parkhouse's statement at the hearing, alleged to constitute an “inaccurate reading of the Borough President's letter,” and quoting from Herbert v Lando, 441 US 153, states that the “spreading false information in and of itself carries no First Amendment credentials … as there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact…. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
Fairbanks North Star Borough v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm
The decision was wrong because the decision-maker had misapplied the principles in Cadona v Mid-Bedfordshire Borough Council [2004] EWCA Civ 925. and Lee v Rhondda County Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1013 . [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm
The decision was wrong because the decision-maker had misapplied the principles in Cadona v Mid-Bedfordshire Borough Council [2004] EWCA Civ 925. and Lee v Rhondda County Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1013 . [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:44 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
