Search for: "State v. Brake" Results 661 - 680 of 972
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
NVidia v Hardware Labs [2016] EWHC 3135(December 2016)This was the exam question posed here. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:25 pm by Rick
  Now comes section 11301 which (I’ve said this all before) supersedes the laws implemented by the CUA and MMPA because it is an initiative of the people (thus not susceptible to being struck down as a portion of the MMPA was in People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:28 am by Eugene Volokh
The ALLOW Act would require officials to scrutinize and justify the district’s occupational regulations in accordance with the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in NC State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:30 pm by Darren O'Donovan
I would reiterate however, that the government’s determination that a constitutional debt brake rule is not required does present some risks – it remains possible (if politically unlikely) for a Member State to sue us arguing that a constitutional debt brake was required by the Treaty. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As correctly stated in the impugned decision, the technical focus is on the use of the sulphides as solid lubricant additive in friction lining mixtures. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Is the United States Over Overdraft Fees? [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 11:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
  It restores the proper role of the judiciary to interpret the law, and puts a needed brake on regulatory overreach by the administrative state. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:11 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Additional Resources: First lawsuit filed in limo crash that killed 1 passenger, injured 5 others, April 7, 2016, By Ed Treleven, Wisconsin State Journal More Blog Entries: Pornomo v. [read post]