Search for: "State v. Carte" Results 661 - 680 of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2010, 1:29 pm by David Cheifetz
The first example offered is the facts of  Cook v Lewis. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:34 am by David Keane
It was pointed out that Irish Travellers have been recognised as an ethnic group in the UK, in O’Leary and Others v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
On Monday, the city of Pleasant Grove, Utah, filed this opening brief with the Supreme Court in the case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:01 pm
 In his 2014 State of the Union Address, President Obama stated:"And let's pass a patent reform bill that allows our businesses to stay focused on innovation, not costly and needless litigation. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The statutorily stated policy or philosophy underlying FOIL is to promote “[t]he people's right to know the process of governmental decision-making and to review the documents and statistics leading to determinations. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm by Mike
When a man with two large shopping carts full of recyclables was crossing the street, Mr. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Richard A. Epstein
  In general, the progressive Justices (often joined by some conservative Justices) will give both the federal and state government carte blanche on general economic regulation. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
Florida (10-1139), raising the issue of whether a state government interferes with foreign policy by barring state college professors from using any funds to visit Cuba or any other “terrorist state”; and Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela, et al., v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 2:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Now none of this means that ‘seeking legal representation’ automatically is a good reason for granting permission to appeal out of time: In no way does that view give carte blanche to delay. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 2:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Now none of this means that ‘seeking legal representation’ automatically is a good reason for granting permission to appeal out of time: In no way does that view give carte blanche to delay. [read post]