Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 661 - 680
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2021, 7:01 pm
” Johnson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 11:56 am
But the appeals court is still weathering the storm in other ways, and today put out its HTC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am
It is not uncommon to see English proceedings used as a counter-strike to a favourable EPO opposition division decision and indeed the existence of national proceedings can be used to accelerate and, if necessary, intervene in a TBA Appeal. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 10:22 am
Yesterday's Washington Supreme Court decision in Stout v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division reversed, on the law, without costs, a Supreme Court ruling that granted an application filed by New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division reversed, on the law, without costs, a Supreme Court ruling that granted an application filed by New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:23 am
Can you then appeal to the trial court and/or the Appellate Division? [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:23 am
Can you then appeal to the trial court and/or the Appellate Division? [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:05 am
This hybrid-rights theory stems from dicta in Employment Division v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
Morelli, decided Friday by the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Zarnoch, joined by Judges Friedman and Gould: In her decision, the Arbitrator, retired Court of Appeals Judge Irma S. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:56 am
A Decision and Order issued last week by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Reginald A. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
With apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning,[1] How may I appoint you; let me count the ways! [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
The United States Supreme Court has opined: “In our adversary system, in both civil and criminal cases, in the first instance and on appeal, we follow the principle of party presentation. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" The Commissioner declined to dismiss the appeal for lack of personal services "Under the circumstances of this appeal," noting that the Board of Regents adopted the version of 8 NYCRR 275.8 (f) applicable here in April 2020, shortly after the Governor declared a State disaster emergency for the entire State of New York on March 7, 2020, finding that "it is in the spirit of the amendment to permit alternative service under the… [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" The Commissioner declined to dismiss the appeal for lack of personal services "Under the circumstances of this appeal," noting that the Board of Regents adopted the version of 8 NYCRR 275.8 (f) applicable here in April 2020, shortly after the Governor declared a State disaster emergency for the entire State of New York on March 7, 2020, finding that "it is in the spirit of the amendment to permit alternative service under the… [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
Dyment, para. 22) Implicitly, the Ontario Court of Appeal also seems to be ready to accept, where appropriate, the tort of “[p]ublic disclosure of embarrassing private facts about the plaintiff” (Jones v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:55 am
Bad faith pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), presupposes the presence of a dishonest state of mind or intention (Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO (C‑104/18 P)). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:19 am
As I wrote here, in 2016 the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department decided Raharney Capital LLC v Capital Stack LLC, overruling its own precedent and joining appellate rulings by the other Departments holding that New York courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over petitions to dissolve foreign business entities. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 6:36 am
Thomas Kuehnen ("Kühnen" in German), who presides over one of two patent-specialized divisions of the Dusseldorf Higher Regional Court (regional appeals court), made no secret of his disagreement with Sisvel v. [read post]
