Search for: "State v. KAVANAUGH" Results 661 - 680 of 2,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from a case called Richey v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:39 pm by Josh Blackman
(Sounds a lot like the rule at issue in New York State Rifle Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:46 am by Michael Stern
” Whether a former president should ever have the unilateral power to assert executive privilege over the objection of the incumbent remains an unsettled issue, as the Supreme Court recently recognized in Trump v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Breyer joined (Iancu v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm by Edward T. Kang
” Last month, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced that he was asking the state’s top prosecutor to consider criminal charges against members of the Sackler family. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:26 pm by Jake S. Truscott and Adam Feldman
Harper (concerning the controversial “independent state legislature” theory of election law), United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 11:14 am by Ilya Somin
Roberts was right in both cases - one of only two justices who can claim that distinction (Kavanaugh is the other). 8. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:40 am by jonathanturley
Many continue to assert that the adoption of a constitutional interpretation that they oppose is, as stated by Rep. [read post]