Search for: "State v. Mason" Results 661 - 680 of 1,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2014, 8:55 am
Mason Contractors, Inc., 307 Conn. 412, 420– 21, 54 A.3d 1005 (2012) (underlying action). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, it affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the contractor (Michael v Pella Products, Inc, June 25, 2014, Mason, M). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 12:02 pm by Law Lady
SPCP GROUP V, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Appellee. 4th District.Municipal corporations -- Ordinances -- Red light cameras -- Ordinances imposing penalties for red light violations detected by devices using cameras were preempted by state law prior to effective date of Mark Wandall Traffic Safety ActRICHARD MASONE, Petitioner, vs. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 8:51 am by Jacek Stramski
By Jacek Stramski The Supreme Court’s joint opinion issued Thursday in Masone v City of Aventura (SC12-644) and City of Orlando v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Adam Mossoff, George Mason University School of Law, has posted O'Reilly v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom issued a ruling on the status of equity partners in law firms that flies in the face a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada.On May 22, the SCC ruled in McCormick v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 7:08 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 In so holding, the court followed the decision of the Second District in State Oil Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
  Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]