Search for: "State v. Padilla"
Results 661 - 680
of 731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2024, 4:26 am
Moreover, shortly after McCardle, the Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Padilla Case (Mar. 11, 2003)7. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 1:15 pm
In 2001, the Supreme Court, in Zadvydas v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
For Green's lawyer, the decision from the 3rd Circuit in Green v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm
Padilla, 542 U.S. 426 (2004)) and who, as a veteran, may not be a huge fan of a provision stating that the Third Geneva Convention won't support a habeas petition. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
Although deportation may result in loss of all that makes life worth living (banishment from the United States and forced separation from one’s family), Ng Fung Ho v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:47 am
" Padilla v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:04 am
" Padilla v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
Frye and Cooper are largely an extension of the Supreme Court’s recognition two years ago in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm
Newman v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
In his Padilla v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm
Sandoval: The Court found that in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 1:58 pm
It echo's the recent dissent of Justice David Souter in Bowles v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:29 am
Circuit later took a similar view in Doe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:03 am
Padilla I, the litigation seeks to enjoin Alex Padilla, the California Secretary of State, from expending taxpayer funds and taxpayer-financed resources to enforce or implement the law, alleging that the law’s mandate is an unconstitutional quota and violates the California constitution. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
See Mock v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
