Search for: "U.S. v. Nixon*" Results 661 - 680 of 801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
Like modern votes of confidence, English history offers us limited guidance when it comes to determining the parameters for impeaching a U.S. president. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm by John Dean
Also, it is not clear to me if Judge Kavanaugh does or does not believe U.S. v Nixon (the 8-0 holding that ended Nixon’s presidency, forcing him to provide prosecutors incriminating secretly recorded conversations) was correctly decided.My second general point is a very important process matter. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 9:21 pm
Again, it is not for the White House to say "what the law is," as we all learned reading Marbury v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
Senator Philip Hart (D-Michigan) remarked that people might have the “accurate impression that U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
The Roberts Court has ruled against tribal interests on numerous occasions, although admittedly the language and tenor of the decision last year in Michigan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The two most influential liberal Justices of the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Consequences for U.S. foreign policy? [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
Those issues relate to the federal courts’ jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution and to the courts’ ability to redress the wrongs alleged in U.S. interbranch disputes. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Bork’s opponents were critical of his opinions about the Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]